


The rigorous research is the book’s strength. Eatwell follows the case from beginning to end, providing background on judges, lawyers, evidence (some fraudulent, some circumstantial and problematic), and unreliable witnesses details the duke and Druce’s similarities (appearance, mannerisms, diet, infirmities, habits) and covers the provocative madness of the trial.

Ten years passed before the case ended in January 1908, ultimately involving 12 judges, 14 hearings, and numerous investigators and witnesses. Druce, also deceased she petitioned the court for an exhumation of Druce, convinced that her son was the duke’s legitimate heir. Straightlaced Victorians reveled in the salacious details of this court case, which began when Anna Maria Druce alleged that the deceased duke had led a double life as businessman T.C. Eatwell ( They Eat Horses, Don’t They?) offers a meticulous examination of a late Victorian/early Edwardian cause célèbre involving the fifth Duke of Portland, a well-to-do London merchant, and a case of disputed identity.
